This website requires Javascript for some parts to function propertly. Your experience may vary.

Anti-suit injunctions in Germany | Hengeler Mueller News

Arbitration Talks

8. November 2024

Anti-suit injunctions in Germany

Anti-Suit Injunctions in Germany: Navigating International Arbitration and Sanctions

Introduction

Anti-suit injunctions (ASIs) have become a potent tool in international commercial disputes, often employed to halt proceedings in foreign courts. This blog post will delve into the unique landscape of ASIs in Germany, with a particular focus on their intersection with international arbitration and sanctions.

Understanding Anti-Suit Injunctions

An ASI is a court order that prohibits a party from pursuing or continuing a lawsuit in another jurisdiction. They are a powerful tool, but their effectiveness and enforceability can vary significantly between jurisdictions.

ASIs in Germany: A Balancing Act

German courts have generally been reluctant to grant ASIs, particularly when they might interfere with the jurisdiction of foreign courts. However, in recent years, there has been a growing recognition of the need for a more nuanced approach.

Key Factors Influencing German Courts:

  • Forum selection clauses: German courts often give weight to forum selection clauses, especially when they are clear and unambiguous.

  • International treaties: Germany is a party to numerous international treaties, and these can influence the court's decision on whether to grant an ASI.

  • Public policy: German courts will consider whether granting an ASI would violate German public policy.

International Arbitration and ASIs

International arbitration is often chosen as a dispute resolution mechanism to avoid the complexities of national court systems. However, disputes can still arise, leading parties to seek ASIs.

Key considerations:

  • Competence-competence principle: Arbitral tribunals generally have the authority to rule on their own jurisdiction.

  • Enforcement of arbitral awards: The New York Convention provides for the broad recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards.

  • Emergency arbitrator proceedings: In some cases, parties may seek emergency relief from an arbitral institution to halt or stay proceedings.

ASIs and Sanctions

Economic sanctions can significantly impact international commercial disputes. When a party is subject to sanctions, the other party may seek an ASI to prevent the sanctioned party from pursuing a claim in a jurisdiction that recognizes those sanctions.

Key issues:

  • Conflict of laws: Determining which jurisdiction's law governs the dispute can be complex when sanctions are involved.

  • Due process concerns: Courts must balance the need to enforce sanctions with the due process rights of the sanctioned party.